sophie l

i think the vikings do not deserv there vielent repyoutashon for the foloing reasens .                                                                                                                                                       1.moest of them were gest harmles farmes  how dident fiet                                         3. bezercers would onley fiet for a god rease

4.scandenaveye wzas could so all the crops and animals dide                                       5.thay mooved to briten to seviv.

100 word challenge Eliza

Once there  was a huge house that was owned by the most famous pop star ever Adele and she lived near a park. This was a park that had just had a bee hive installed.But no they weren’t any ordinary bees they were huge gold bees.It then was the day that the pop star had her concert.

JABRIIL

ONCE THERE WASA BUILDING THAT WAS COVERD IN GOLDEN BEES THERE STING CARRIED10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 LETERS OF POSIN ENOUGH TO KILL 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 PEOPLE THEY WERE FROCIOUS  THEY COULD DEFEAT THE ENGLISH  MILATRRY NAVY AND THE  POLICE THESE ANIMALS WERE KEPT IN  THE  ZOO  BUT TODAY THE DESATER  WAS UNBELIVEBLE THEY HAD ESCAPED THE ZOO BECAUSE  SOME ONE HAD KILLED THE LEADER WITH  A RIFLE AND THE ANGER THAT HAD SHOOK THE  WORLD COULD BE HEARD FROM ALL FOUR COR NES OF THE EARTH THE WORLD WILL BE DESTROED  AND THE ONE TO BLAME WAS THE FAMILY OF THE DEAD KILLER TO BE KILLED.

Do the Vikings deserve their violent reputation?

I think that the Vikings don’t deserve their violent reputation because most were evil and did bad things such as going around killing innocent people. If they were all alive now most would go to jail .And if you don’t believe me here are my reasons .

Firstly, they all came to invade without asking.  They came all the way from Scandinavia without asking ,to then ruin the UK!?I can’t believe they just barged into our homes without being invited or born their. The Anglo-Saxons weren’t that settled but they could fight.

Secondly, they all had a job but the main was fighting . Hundreds of people were killed just because of them.It would have been more peaceful if they didn’t come to Britain.

Finally ,they just wanted to be famous. If you just made a difference then your famous . That is what the Vikings did .

Those are my reasons so I hope you believe me.:] 

 

 

Ole

Do the vikings deserve their violent reputation?

I think the Vikings do and don’t deserve their violent reputation for the following reasons.

Firstly, they do deserve their violent reputation because they killed a lot of people. Secondly,they do not deserve their violent reputation because most of them are farmers.Lots of farmers kill animals but they aren’t humans.

   Image result for vikings

muhanad

.I  think the vikings do deserve their violent reputation for the following reasons.

 

Firstly the vikings started a fight  and killed haft they  are men .

That is not fer we were looking for food are home is cold and wet and hardly food there because of climate change it kill there crops and they think that it is all right to kill

 

 

Image result for viking

 

 

Amelia

I think that the Vikings do deserve their violent reputation for the following  reasons….

Firstly,  they were invaders and they killed lots of people.  Secondly, they stole from lots of people and they did not do it very politely. They used dragon heads on the prow of their long boats to scare their enemies.

Image result for images of vikings

Mia

Did the vikings deserve their violent reputation?

I think that the vikings do and don’t deserve their violent reputation for these following reasons…

First of all the vikings do deserve their violent reputation because they killed lot’s of people but they don’t deserve their violent reputation because not all the vikings were violent most of them were farmers .

Image result for vikings real

Nathan

Did the vikings deserve their violent reputation?

I think that the vikings both did and did not deserve their violent reputation because of the following reasons…

My reason of why the vikings deserve their violent reputation is that they killed people. They attacked the poor monks. They vikings did not care if the monks were alive or not.

Image result for viking pictures 

My reason of why the vikings didn’t deserve their violent reputation is that most of them were farmers and only the beserkers were violent. They had to survive.

 

 

 

Teresa’s topic work

Did the Vikings deserve their violent reputation?

think the Vikings did deserve their violent reputation because they were extremely violent people. Here are some reasons why: 

They killed lots of people, they robbed people, they invaded and many other violent things.                            

 

They were peaceful farmers, they got on with their lives once they had settled and it the monks that attacked them, not them attacking the monks.

Even though they were peaceful farmers, excellent builders, amazing sailors they were incredibly violent people. The definition of a Viking would be a huge tribe ready to fight.Why would they do this? Because they were incredibly violent. Even though the farmland was poor, their were so many floods and not enough crops to live, that wouldn’t mean they could come and invade uninvited. The Berserkers were the Viking soldiers, and they really deserve their violent reputation. they were the most violent of the era.

In conclusion, the Vikings did deserve their violent reputation.